Saturday, April 25, 2009

Alarming Situation! Is United States Failing to Quit?

CDC reported that 45 million men and women were smokers in 2005 and the number was same as in 2004. Does that symbolize the weakness of human beings in front of tobacco?

The CDC reports that according to new statistics, the 8-year decline in smoking among adults in the United States might be freezing. The 2005 figures appeared in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Data were provided by a nationwide government survey of about 31,000 adults, 18 and older, who were interviewed in person. Current smokers were defined as those who said they had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and reported smoking every day or some days. Let me read out the CDC report to those who smoke;

  • Kentucky claimed the prize as the smokiest state.
  • The smokers who attempted to quit did not make it into the ranks of the 46.5 million Americans classified as former cigarette smokers in 2005.
  • 36.5 million people smoked cigarettes daily in 2005
  • About 8 million more smoked on some days, says the CDC.
  • Men were more likely than women to smoke cigarettes;
  • Young adults had the highest cigarette smoking rate of all age groups.
  • Cigarette smoking was most common among people who hadn't finished high school, or who had a General Educational Development (GED) degree.
To control the situation, the CDC suggests strategies like raising prices for tobacco products, launching quit-smoking media campaigns, and cutting smokers' out-of-pocket costs for quit-smoking programs, therapies, and counseling.

But, the matter of fact remains a question?.why people are failing to quit smoking? Even when so many efforts are being put in anti-tobacco awareness and smoking cessation media campaigns? What the CDC is suggesting has already been tried and tested, isn?t it? But the outcome is clear as day light. So, what do we do now? when the fear of early death, cancer and various other life-threatening diseases are not able to stop the smokers from smoking?

We should delve deep into the problem to find out the root? After all why do we fail? Even alcohol abuse could be controlled, then why has cigarette emerged as such a big challenge today? What is the reason? Should we blame nicotine for it?but that?s what we have been doing so long?nicotine is the only reason behind addiction to cigarettes or any other tobacco product.

Blaming is not going to help; this is a situation of crisis because as per the CDC report ?Cigarette smoking was most common among people who hadn't finished high school, or who had a General Educational Development (GED) degree?, the future of next generation is at stake.

Smokers, you don?t care for your own life, that is understood and obvious?but what about your children? Do you wish them to die early suffering from cancer and other life threatening diseases? Think about it?

The author, Monalisa Hyden, addresses psychological and health related issues. If you wish to help yourself and your loved ones in quit smoking, you can log on to http://www.chantixhome.com for more information and advice.


Thursday, April 9, 2009

TV Stars Really? They Started on the Legit Stage


Many times the general public associates an actor with a role they
play on a long-running television show, not realizing that often
that thespian had an active career on the stage first. Jerry Orbach
and Sam Waterston on Law and Order, Jason Alexander on
Seinfeld, and Patricia Heaton on Everybody Loves Raymond are a
few of the many actors who first trained for, cut their teeth on, and
professionally performed on the legitimate stage.


The fact is the technique most often taught to American stage
actors - some form of the Stanislavski Method - works very nicely
on both TV and film. Although there are adjustments to be made
going from the stage to television, a well-trained stage actor can
usually make those adjustments fairly quickly.


The biggest changes have to do with the subtlety employed by
those acting for the camera. Stage actors find that physically and
vocally less is more in front of the camera. Additionally, a good film
or television actor has a sound sense of how to use the camera
frame to their best advantage. An actor like Michael Caine is a
master at this.


For someone who has only done television or film, acting on the
stage can be difficult. The stage demands that actors sustain a
character for long periods of time, something the electronic media
does not do. Overall, stage performing also calls for bigger actions
than those needed for television and film. If someone has never
been trained for the theatre, this can be intimidating.


Of course the scariest thing about acting on stage is the fact that
you??re in front of a live audience and if you make a mistake, you
don??t get a Mulligan. Even when a television show is done in front
of a live audience, there??s less pressure for the actor to be
perfect. If they go up (that is, forget their lines), they can make a
joke and get a laugh while cut is called. They then get to try the
moment, action or scene again. There is no cut in a live stage
performance; there is only covering for a flubbed line, a missed
entrance, or a misplaced prop.


Here are a few actors that you??ve become familiar with on
television who first acted on the legitimate stage.


Jerry Orbach


Orbach, who passed away in 2004, was best known as the
wisecracking Detective Lennie Briscoe on Law and Order. As a
young man, he attended the University of Illinois and
Northwestern University where he studied drama. After going to
New York, he continued to study for the stage. He became closely
associated with musicals, creating the role of El Gallo and singing
the well-know opening number Try to Remember in the long-
running musical The Fantasticks. He won the Tony in 1969 for his
portrayal of Chuck Baxter in Promises, Promises; he sang the hit
song I??ll Never Fall in Love Again in that show. He also played
leads in Chicago (Billy Flynn) and Forty-Second Street (Julian
Marsh). Most Law and Order fans don??t realize that Orbach had a
beautiful, resonate singing voice.


Bebe Neuwirth


Beatrice Bebe Neuwirth has recently become a regular on Law
and Order, where she plays the role of Tracey Kibre. However, it
was on the sitcom Cheers that she found fame by playing Lilith
Sternin-Crane - a tough, tense psychiatrist and wife of Frasier
Crane. Neuwirth trained at the Julliard School and first made her
name as a dancer and actor in the national tour of A Chorus Line
(1980), where she played Cassie and Sheila. In 1982, she
appeared on Broadway in Dancin??, directed and choreographed by
the legendary Bob Fosse, and in the musical Little Me. She
cemented her reputation on the Great White Way by playing the
lead in Bob Fosse??s revival of the musical Sweet Charity (1986), for
which she won a Tony. Neuwirth is an amazing, charismatic musical
performer, who commands the stage with her voice and body.


Jason Alexander


Best know as Jerry Seinfeld??s obnoxious best friend George
Costanza in the sitcom Seinfeld, Alexander, who was born Jay
Greenspan in Newark, NJ, is another former Tony winner. While he
was an undergraduate at Boston College, Alexander was cast in
Stephen Soundheim??s Broadway musical Merrily We Roll Along. He
won the Best Actor in A Musical Tony for his role in Jerome Robbin??s
Broadway (1989). In the first few episodes of Seinfeld, he wasn??t
quite sure of how to play George Castanza so he imitated Woody
Allen.


Sam Waterston


On television he plays tough, no nonsense D.A. Jack McCoy in Law
and Order (1990), but originally Waterston was best known for his
stage roles. He went to Yale, where he did not study acting, but
did taking acting classes at the American Actors Workshop in Paris.
Waterston?played numerous roles in New York, including Jonathan
in Oh, Dad, Poor, Dad, Mama??s Hung You in the Closet and I??m
Feeling so Sad, Hamlet in Hamlet, and Signoir Benedick of Padua in
Much Ado About Nothing, for which he won the Drama desk award
for Best Actor. Prior to becoming associated with Law and Order,
he was best known for his work in straight plays, both new and
classic. On stage, Waterston perfected an elegant, refined style,
displaying an ability to make precise and subtle acting choices.


Barry Bostwick


On the Michael J. Fox sitcom Spin City, Bostwick played the
dimwitted mayor Randall M. Winston Jr. in 70 episodes. Since that
time, he??s appeared on numerous hit TV shows as a guest star,
including Scrubs, Cold Case and Law and Order. But Bostwick has
deep Broadway roots that include the creation of the role of Danny
Zuko in Grease, for which he received a Best Actor in a Musical
nomination, and the creation of the lead role of Jamie Lockhart in
the musical The Robber Bridegroom, for which he won the Tony.
Bostwick, who also played in numerous straight plays, was known
for his high energy and slapdash style. While performing in his
award winning run as Jamie Lockhart, Bostwick broke his arm
when he fell swinging across the stage on a rope. He proved he
was a trouper though when, after a short recuperative period, he
got back on stage with his arm in a cast and continued to play
Lockhart, rope swing and all.


Patricia Heaton


For 70 episodes, Heaton played Debra Barone, Ray Romano??s wife
on the very popular sitcom Everybody Loves Raymond. As a young
woman, she focused on theatre arts at Ohio State University and
then went to New York where she studied with William Esper. She
made her debut in the Broadway gospel musical Don??t Get God
Started, but overall during her career in New York she was
relegated to small roles. With a few acting buddies, she started a
theatre company called Stage Three, which produced new works in
NYC. In 1989 they took their successful production of The
Johnstown Vindicator to Los Angeles, where casting directors saw
and liked Heaton. Slowly her TV career started to take off. But
Heaton has long acknowledged that despite the fact that she
never made it big on Broadway, her stage training has been
instrumental to her success on television.


James Gandolfini


Gandolfini continues his run as the cold-hearted, insecure,
narcissistic Tony Soprano on HBO??s hit series The Sopranos. After
receiving a degree in Communications from Rutgers University,
Gandolfini went on to study acting in the late 1980??s at the
prestigious Actors Studio in New York City. After making his
professional stage debut in Big El's Best Friend, he appeared in
many New York productions. He made his Broadway debut in 1992
as Steve Hubbell in the revival of Tennessee Williams?? A Streetcar
Named Desire, which starred Alex Baldwin and Jessica Lang. Other
New York credits included On the Waterfront, One Day Wonder and
Tarantulas Dancing. The same year he first appeared on
Broadway, he also landed his first screen role, which was in Sidney
Lumet's A Stranger Among Us. Since 1992, he??s appeared in over
20 films. He??s been Tony Soprano in over 70 episodes.


Other actors, who have either made their name or learned
invaluable acting lessons in the theatre before becoming part of
the electronic entertainment industry, include Martin Sheen,
Stockard Channing, Dustin Hoffman, Robert Duvall, Meryl Streep,
and Swoosie Kurtz. These actors have labored hard to learn their
craft on what was the first acting platform available to humankind -
the live stage.


Movies are a little over 100 years old and television is about 75
years old. The formal theatre goes back over 2,500 years! It??s the
true learning and testing ground for acting technique, stamina, and
skill that, once honed, can then be transferred to any other venue.


Go to a Broadway show or a professional theatre near you - you
may catch a performance by someone you??ll see break through on
the tube in the next few years. One night, you??ll be sitting in your
den or living room watching the next big hit drama or sitcom and
say, Hey, didn??t we see that actor on the stage? Yeah, you did,
before they were famous. Very cool.

About the Author

This article was written by Paul Mroczka sponsored by http://www.stubhub.com/. If you're looking for tickets for the next Broadway show, look no further than Stubhub.com where fans buy and sell the hottest Broadway tickets.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Which Mac is Right for Me?

Now that you have decided that you are going to get a Mac, it's time to figure out which Mac is the right one for you. There really isn't a wrong choice here, it's more a matter of getting the best use out of your money and not over or under-spending your hard earned cash.

Here are some questions to ask yourself to help narrow it down 1. Do you need portability? 2. What are you going to use your Mac for? 3. What is your Budget? 4. Intel or Power PC?

Starting with Question number 1. Do you need portability? This is fairly straight forward but I think you should really take some time to consider this question rather then just jump into it, for example here is a list of Pros and Cons for each choice.

  • Laptops are ultra portable, great for the person on the move or even just carrying it around the house. Why not surf the Web from your couch?
  • Laptops take up very little space and are great for small work areas or even people who want to use them on a boat, motor-home or maybe a dorm-room situation.
  • Laptops require no setup, everything is built-in and ready to go.
  • Laptops generally cost more then Desktops and can sometime have less raw power, speed, space compared to their Desktop equivalent.
  • Laptops are generally harder and more expensive to upgrade because of all the miniaturized components that go into them.

Desktops have the most raw power and performance for the money.

  • Desktops can be upgraded easier and usually for less then a Laptop.
  • Desktops take up more space and usually require a bit of setup like keyboards, mice, speakers and monitors to plugin.
  • Desktops always require household power, no power-no computer.
Question 2. What are you going to use your Mac for? It's important that you match your computer to your needs or requirements. Higher end Macs have more then just enhanced specifications, they tend to have more feature geared towards the professional user.

For example:

  • PowerBooks and MacBook Pros have PC Card slots for even more connectivity.
  • PowerBooks and MacBooks support the Apple 30 inch Dual-Port DVI monitor.
  • They also have high end video cards capable of supporting multiple monitors each with their own desktop.
  • Another cool feature is the ability to plugin a USB keyboard to a PowerBook or MacBook with the lid closed and use an external monitor saving your Laptops built- in monitor life-span and at the same time giving you a home Desktop experience with your Laptop.
  • A PowerMac Desktop is also setup for ultimate performance, It has the most upgradability of any Mac, the fastest processors, tons of room for ram and hard drives, support for multiple Dual-port DVI monitors, PCI slots for audio and video cards, faster ports, buses and drives.
  • An iBook, Mac mini and iMac may not share all of these features so make sure to decide what you need and don't need for your computing needs.

Question 3. What is your Budget? If money was no object who wouldn't pickup a new MacBook Pro? The reality is money is usually the first thing we consider when making a purchase, well at least for me it does.

Don't worry Apple has some excellent entry level products that include everything that most people are looking for and then some! For example, even iBooks ship with DVD burners, Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth, tons of connectivity ports and host of software that will put a Windows PC to shame.

If you are going to be using your new Mac for basic uses like email, Web-surfing, Word-porcessing and other basic picture, music, video and Web uses then really any new Mac will be more then adequate.

Question 4. Intel or Power PC? At this time Apple is going through a significant processor architecture change. Apple has made the commitment to change all of its G4 and G5 computers from the Power PC Chip architecture to Intel's X86 Chip PC based architecture over the course of this year. You might ask why Apple is making this change? PC based Chips have experienced leaps and bounds as far as performance goes so it only makes sense for Apple to ensure they are not limiting performance by solely using Power PC Chips. Now that Apple is supporting the PC based Chip architecture, they have the ability to use any Chip they want and at this time the Intel Chip seems to be the best solution.

What does this all mean? In a nutshell it means that not all programs written for OSX will run on an Intel based Mac at this time. Only programs that have been updated to support both Power PC and X86 chip-sets will run natively on all Macs, this type of program is called a Universal application. To help ease the transition Apple has created a piece of software called Rosetta that is designed to work transparently translating program code from Power PC to the new Intel language. The downside to this is that not all Power PC programs will run in Rosetta and those that do run lack the performance of the Universal applications.

More and more programs are getting updated to Universal everyday, just make sure that if you are planning on getting a New Intel Mac then also make sure the programs you need to run will at least run with Rosetta support.

One other new and interesting advantage to getting an Intel based Mac is the possibility of running Windows just as if you where suing a PC. This could be a big plus for anyone who needs to run Windows applications.

Apple is always outdoing themselves making better and faster machines. My personal opinion is that any relatively new Mac with a G4, G5 or Intel Chip is going to be a great investment, I would even go so far as saying that given the choice of an outdated Mac or a top of the line PC, I would go for the Mac any day!!

Now that you know some of the basics on what to consider when deciding which Mac is right for you, I would suggest you go down to your local Mac dealer and take some for a test drive...

Author - Michael Kaye
Founder of http://www.SwitchingToMac.com
once you go Mac - you never go back


Sunday, April 5, 2009

How to Hire Domestic Help


Are you absolutely certain that your cleaning service company or private maid is trustworthy? According to Mark Roselli of The Mang Insurance Group, a national survey of insurance companies concluded that 44.6% of all theft claims are derived from domestic cleaning services. In addition, Mr. Roselli states that most cleaning service companies are underinsured - protecting themselves from theft and/or damage of company property but not covering their customers. He also stated that criminal background checks are not required in order to purchase bonding insurance. These staggering facts should be of great concern to anyone hiring domestic help. Before you agree to let a stranger into your home, whether you are hiring a private maid or a cleaning service company, you must be assured that you are not putting yourself at risk.


As the owner of a cleaning service company since 1989, and as a consultant for residential cleaning companies since 2004, I have heard about many experiences. Aside from underinsured companies who may have criminals on staff, there are less dire concerns to consider. One woman came home from a month in the hospital to find her private maid had not only moved in, but brought her family of five with her. Another hired a franchise service that apparently came in only to pick up her check each time they were supposed to clean her home. I've been told about another franchise service that sent a team of three cleaning ladies to perform a cleaning, but the customer could not communicate with them because none of the three spoke English.


To ensure that you have an acceptable experience you must do your research before hiring a cleaning company. My recommendations are:


1. Remember that the fee alone should not determine who you hire.


2. Ask for proof of insurance to be sent directly from the insurance company so that you will have a document on hand should an incident occur. (Insist that the insurance certificate is sent to you by the insurance company, not the cleaning company.) Here are some coverage guidelines:


*Bonding insurance can be as low as $1,000 and protects you against theft ONLY if it is a Third Party Bond. Proper coverage would be a minimum of a $25,000 third party bond.


*Liability coverage insures that any accident will not be charged to your homeowners' policy ONLY if it is Third Party Coverage. A minimum of $1,000,000 is desirable for liability coverage.


*Worker's compensation insures that any personal injury occurring on your property is not charged to your home owner's policy.


3. Be certain that you feel comfortable with the owner of the cleaning company, as they will be your contact should there be any problems with the service. Inquire about company policies regarding inadequate service, problems with employees and insurance claims. How long will it be before you are reimbursed for damaged or missing items? Will you be reimbursed for inadequate cleaning, or will a team be sent to reclean your home, and how long will this take?


4. Ask if the cleaning company checks employment and criminal records. From one hundred applications reviewed we can invite an average of ten for interviews because of a lack of stability in work history and residence. Out of the ten applicants invited for an interview, nine are eliminated because of poor work ethics, excessive residences and/or criminal records. Although my company would bring in more immediate income if I carelessly hired anyone who applied, I assure you that repeat business would suffer tremendously and my customers would feel violated.


5. How far back does the company check criminal records? A ten year background check is the legal maximum in some states; however a twenty year check is more desirable. I have seen applicants who appeared to be upstanding citizens but had criminal records reminiscent of infamous outlaws of the Wild West. One young woman who had applied to be a maid had six pages of offenses and had served time for safe cracking! Another mild mannered applicant had served time for armed robbery. Although these are extreme cases they serve to make a point -- if your cleaning service does not check criminal records then you may be inviting a felon into your home. Most often the criminal records of applicants are clean; however ten percent include assault, disturbing the peace and serious traffic violations. These are the records of applicants whose applications were above average -- can you imagine who will be sent to your home if the company you hire does not enforce the most stringent hiring policies?


6. If you prefer to hire a private maid then be certain that you perform a criminal record check. Remember that appearances can be deceiving and references can be falsified.


In most situations your greatest concern will be getting value for your investment. If you invest $120 to have your home cleaned and are unhappy with the results, then you have the opportunity to see first hand how the internal policies of the company work. Does the company have policies, procedures and resources which allow them to handle your complaint professionally and with diplomacy? Do they offer immediate remedies to correct any problem? Not only should you be assured that the company you have invited to be such an important part of your life will clean your home properly and without incident, but that they will take your concerns seriously.


The labor intensity of the residential cleaning industry is equally rivaled by the communication and management intensity. If the cleaning company does not utilize proper management techniques, your overall experience will not be desirable.


In conclusion, as with any important decision you should educate yourself before making a final choice on which company you'll allow to clean your home. Make inquires by phone, in person, online, speak to friends and neighbors about their experiences with local cleaning companies. Bottom line - you are getting ready to invite people into your home, for many their most private and prized possession. Be certain that your decision is an educated and prudent one, not solely based upon price. Like so many of our customers you may find that a decade later the same friendly faces and good service are a refreshing and very necessary part of your life.


Copyright ? 2004 MaidDocs? ~ All rights reserved.
About the Author

Walter L. Gibson established the cleaning company Maid in North Carolina in 1989 and gained a copyright for his business system in 2004, creating MaidDocs.com. MaidDocs offers documents and forms, custom forms packages or a complete cleaning business system for residential cleaning service companies. Visit http://www.MaidDocs.com/shop for complete information.

Friday, April 3, 2009

Apple Useful In Combating Diarrhea

Apple information and how it is used as a herb in alternative herbal treatments to treat ailments and problems such as stomach cramps, cancer and diabetes.

Although we believe in the therapeutic and healing properties of herbs, care must be taken in the use thereof, as they are powerful compounds.

Botanical Classification: Family Rosaceae

Genus and specie: Malus sylvestris or Pyrus malus.

Description of the herb apple:

This commonplace tree can grow up to 40 feet high and more than 300 varieties are found.

Parts used:

The fruits and leaves are used.

Properties:

The fruit varies and taste and texture range from crisp to mealy and can be sweet or sour, depending on the variety. The fruits have great anti-diarrhea and laxative properties, and although it sounds like a contradiction, both of these conditions can be helped with apples.

Therapeutic uses:

Internal use:

The pectin in apples is transformed into a soothing coating for the intestines by intestinal bacteria, which eases stomach cramps.

Pectin adds bulk to stools and is useful in combating diarrhea.

A study that appeared in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute hints that pectin may stop cancer spreading through the body, and that pectin binds certain carcinogenic compounds in the colon, speeding their elimination from the body.

A study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine showed that apple pectin helps to reduce blood sugar levels in diabetics.

Apple pectin reportedly helps retain cholesterol in the stomach, binding cholesterol to itself and carrying it through the digestive tract to be eliminated and is also reported to help the body rid itself of
. lead
. mercury
. and other heavy metals prevalent in modern water, food, and air.

External use:

Apple leaves contain phloretin, which is a natural antibiotic.

Crushed clean apple leaves may be applied to minor wounds and scratches as a temporary treatment until the wounds can be cleaned and bandaged.

Aromatherapy and essential oil use:

None noted.

Safety precautions and warnings:

An apple seed contains a high level of cyanide - so much so that ingesting massive amounts of apple seeds can be fatal, and it is not advisable to eat great amounts of apple seeds.

People with weak stomachs, prone to diarrhea or constipation must eat apples in moderation, as it can precipitate either of the conditions in susceptible individuals.

Large amounts of apple pectin could delay the absorption of most drugs if taken at the same time.

Gerald Crawford was born in South Africa, studied electronics, telecommunication, eco-travel and african travel concepts. He taught responsible tourism in South Africa. If you have any questions or comments please e-mail me on. E-mail Address: southafricantravelarticles@12234455.co.za Website Address: www.12234455.co.za


Blogger template 'Fundamental' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008.

Jump to TOP

Blogger templates by OurBlogTemplates.com